![Forensically App Forensically App](https://mlqpcgrimy67.i.optimole.com/ewGDv78-NPB2T_OG/w:auto/h:auto/q:auto/https://secindgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Crime-Scene-Assistant-app-features.jpg)
![Forensically App Forensically App](https://blog.oxygen-forensic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/E01-Image-Support-768x541.png)
Some of the forensic disciplines in use may be capable of consistently producing accurate results, but there has not been sufficient research to establish validity. Bite mark comparison is an example of an analysis that is unreliable and inaccurate. Studies have demonstrated that some forensic methods used in criminal investigations cannot consistently produce accurate results. Unreliable or invalid forensic discipline.
![Forensically App Forensically App](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iJ7v7i1_kxE/maxresdefault.jpg)
Through the examination of more than 360 DNA exonerations, the Innocence Project has seen many examples of problems in the foundation or application of forensic science, including: Forensic science, or more specifically, problems in forensic science, contributes to many wrongful convictions, as seen in in nearly half (45%) of DNA exoneration cases and one-quarter (24%) of all exonerations in the United States.